<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earthquake Risk in Las Vegas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.syzdekistan.com/2008/04/17/earthquake-risk-in-las-vegas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.syzdekistan.com/2008/04/17/earthquake-risk-in-las-vegas/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:00:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tell Me The Good About Las Vegas - Nevada (NV) - Page 4 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.syzdekistan.com/2008/04/17/earthquake-risk-in-las-vegas/comment-page-1/#comment-24080</link>
		<dc:creator>Tell Me The Good About Las Vegas - Nevada (NV) - Page 4 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.syzdekistan.com/2008/04/17/earthquake-risk-in-las-vegas/#comment-24080</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by MediocreButArrogant    mod cut:  A magnitude 6.0 earthquake is 10x smaller than a magnitude 7.0, and would cause moderate damage but not &quot;level the entire city of Las Vegas&quot;. Even a 7.0 wouldn&#039;t do that, and I lived through the 7.0 Loma Prieta earthquake, and at the moment am posting from inside one of the millions of homes in the Bay Area that managed to survive that earthquake with no damage.  That fault isn&#039;t active anyway.    i apologize, i had read the article and forgot quite awhile ago what exactly it said, so my statement is not true about earthquake damage  this is the article i had read Earthquake Risk in Las Vegas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by MediocreButArrogant    mod cut:  A magnitude 6.0 earthquake is 10x smaller than a magnitude 7.0, and would cause moderate damage but not &quot;level the entire city of Las Vegas&quot;. Even a 7.0 wouldn&#39;t do that, and I lived through the 7.0 Loma Prieta earthquake, and at the moment am posting from inside one of the millions of homes in the Bay Area that managed to survive that earthquake with no damage.  That fault isn&#39;t active anyway.    i apologize, i had read the article and forgot quite awhile ago what exactly it said, so my statement is not true about earthquake damage  this is the article i had read Earthquake Risk in Las Vegas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Shey</title>
		<link>http://www.syzdekistan.com/2008/04/17/earthquake-risk-in-las-vegas/comment-page-1/#comment-9610</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Shey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.syzdekistan.com/2008/04/17/earthquake-risk-in-las-vegas/#comment-9610</guid>
		<description>In December of 2006, I had a dream about a Las Vegas earthquake.  If you want to read the dream, go to my website:  wallsofjericho.50megs.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In December of 2006, I had a dream about a Las Vegas earthquake.  If you want to read the dream, go to my website:  wallsofjericho.50megs.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
